The Tudo Street
Whizzer!
|
|
|
While serving as a radio
operator with the U.S. Air Force at Tan Son Nhut Air BaseRVN, (1967-1968), I had occasion to visit the city of Saigon fairly
frequently. Saigon was always an interesting place to me and where the U.S. Embassy was located, but still
culturally light-years away from my home in California, which was where
I had spent my first twenty years. Saigon had a kind of magical,
carnival-like quality to it. Above all, I remember the hustle and bustle
of vehicles and people on Saigon's main commercial street which was
called Tudo.
On Tudo (Freedom) Street,
cars, trucks, military vehicles, scooters, pedicabs (motorized and not),
and bicycles all seemed to converge in some incoherent mess which,
miraculously, seemed to nearly always right itself. That conglomeration of
vehicles, and somehow in its collective wisdom, slowed and swerved in a
zig-zaggy fashion in order to just narrowly miss one another, and just at
the right moment. Sometimes they did not miss each other, since Tudo
street always seemed to be just a great jumbled and clogged mess of
individual machines whose operators did not always judge distance
accurately, or who just managed to misjudge the actions of other machine
operators at the most inappropriate time. Crash, slam, crunch!... as
vehicles would sometimes collide. Such a collision created in its wake the
sound of honk, honks...beep, beeps! Or... was it the other way around?
Just as Tudo Street, the
roadway, was clogged with vehicles plus the occasional brave soul who
dared cross the street, the Tudo Street sidewalks were likewise clogged
with people. Most of the people were closely moving, but slowly in one
direction or another along the sidewalks, and in almost a heel-to-toe and
nose-to-neck manner. Other people, the Vietnamese vendors, whose sidewalk
storefronts sold all sorts of black market American goods, presented
obstacles to the free flow of pedestrian traffic on the sidewalks. So,
sometimes in order to continue in the normal American GI gait of moving on
along straightway, one had to step off the sidewalk and onto the street
momentarily so as to avoid a slow moving clog of pedestrians just ahead.
One afternoon on a
sunny day in Saigon in 1967, my buddy and I were doing the town. Just
walkin' around, mind you. He and I were doing nothing special. We were
gawkers and just plain observers of the sights, sounds, and smells
surrounding us on Tudo Street while we walked along one of its sidewalks.
As the traffic light turned green (yes, mom, Saigon had traffic lights),
my bud and I cautiously crossed the street to the next block on Tudo
Street, with him walking in front of me a few paces. I noticed that he had
stepped onto the sidewalk but after having taken a few steps had taken an
abnormally wide semicircular path onto the street itself. I figured he was
avoiding another pedestrian clog on the Tudo Street sidewalk, but I
thought he was nuts to get so close in the path of traffic, given those
crazy vehicle drivers on Tudo Street. It was shortly after my
"so-astute" observation of my buddy's behavior that I met the
Tudo Street Whizzer.
As I was a few paces behind
my bud, I also swerved in my travel from the sidewalk and onto the street,
as indeed I did see a blockade of pedestrians on the sidewalk. Normal,
right? Although, I did not take the greater semicircular swath onto the
street that he did. While I confidently moved beyond that clump of
pedestrians on the sidewalk, I simultaneously saw and felt the Whizzer's
presence. Glancing off the bottom of my right cuff leg, but squarely
hitting my moving left thigh there was the unmistakable vision of fluid
and the feeling of wetness. Yes, I had been whizzed on, peed onto,
urinated upon by the Tudo Street Whizzer.
The worst was that now I
had to change clothing, and that would be a hassle as it meant going back
to the base. Just after I noticed that I was whizzed upon, I slowed,
stopped and turned, but saw that the Whizzer was a young boy, probably
around 7-9 years of age, and in a school uniform. We looked at each other,
and he giggled along with his other young schoolmates. I just walked on
and beyond the laughter and giggles of those young kids. GI Number One I
guess, and for a variety of reasons, not the least of which was getting
accidentally whizzed upon, and owing to GI stupidity and especially
because of the culture differences.
Then as now,
and in California, I don't think that public urination was or is
permitted. And, if caught, you could be hauled off to the brig, or
hoosgal, or by any other word simply the slammer. But, in Saigon and by
contrast, male citizens especially there and then whizzed when necessary
and wherever. Now, just tell me, who's culture is better, boys? Think
about beer, and lots of it. And yet, if you happen to get the opportunity,
and by some time travel kind of device, to go to Saigon in 1967, just be a
little more skeptical about those smells in the streets of Saigon. I think
that they are a stewy mixture of things I had never before considered.
But, the culture of Vietnam, especially as it then-concerned the matter of
public relief is quite a draw for me. I think that there is something
there, fellas. Now, in 1998, the culture of Vietnam is a draw for me for
entirely different reasons.
|
Lisa's below email to me came as a
bolt out of the blue after she read my story at war-stories about the Tudo
Street Whizzer. I've pasted her and my emails, with a slight editing by me
to take out website references I made, and the result is what appears
below. Otherwise, the email exchange which appears below is how it
happened. I have no idea where Lisa lives.
Of particular interest to me was Lisa's, a high school senior, reply to
me. The more time that passes, the more I feel compelled to pass along
things I've learned, or think that I know. The best part is that perhaps
my recollections/opinions will motivate kids to think.
Best regards, Dan McKegney
Lisa's Question
Hi - my name is Lisa, and I'm a
senior in high school. We're reading "The Things They
Carried" in my English class, and as a supplement to that, we
were assigned to read some stories from war-stories.com. When we were
given the assignment, I have to admit I was a bit skeptical. I have
the utmost respect for anyone who has ever served in the military, war
or peace time, as well as the civilians involved in conflicts. That's
actually where my skepticism stemmed from-by having these experiences
pounded into our heads over and over again, we as students become
desensitized to them. No longer able to appreciate the full
implications of what happened - death tolls become just numbers and
everyone misses the big picture. I think this is a horrible thing to
have happened. I think it's extremely important that kids understand
exactly what war means and does, so I wasn't looking forward to this
assignment. But then I read your story "Saigon - The Tudo Street
Whizzer" and was very pleasantly surprised. I love the fact that
your story incorporates some of the good you experienced over there. I
really love it whenever I see any representation of history where the
people who are needlessly villanized aren't for a change, and that's
the impression I got
from your story. I think it's great that you wrote it (I think it's
well written too by the way) and I thank you on behalf of the rest of
my classmates. If you've got time to respond, I'd really like if you
could answer a question I have. Knowing what you know now, after being
in the war, if given the chance to decide back then, would you have
gone? I can see reasons for both yes and no, but never having
experienced anything like it, I could never know.
Thank you!
Lisa
My Response to Lisa'
Question
Dear Lisa,
What a delightful surprise it was to receive an email from you concerning
my little story about the "Whizzer". I have three lovely nieces,
ages 24, 21, and 15. When each of them became old enough to understand, I
would talk with each about the importance of developing an understanding
of war...if that is possible for anyone to do. My discussion with them
always focused on the profound responsibility each will have as they grow
into adulthood. That responsibility includes keeping well informed about
events outside their own zip code, learning about the historical context
of wars, and exercising their right to vote when given the opportunity.
I referred to those responsibilities as profound because they can deal
with life and death matters, especially when it comes to war. In fact, I
recently sent my youngest niece an email in which I talked about war and
the necessity for developing an understanding of history. I mentioned to
her that in order to make well-informed decisions, she had to acquaint
herself with issues of war and peace. I told her that it could be possible
in the future that she would have to send her son or daughter off to war,
just like my mother had to do in 1967 when I was 20 years old. Given the
recent tragic events in America and the Middle East and the uncertainties
surrounding war, that possibility is real, though far off for her at 15
years of age. And yet, I want to instill in her the habit of thinking
outside the immediacy of her own experience; I know that is a tough thing
to do for a teenager...I was a teenager once and I remember. Well, Lisa,
enough of my pontificating and now to answer your question.
Your question was: in consideration of what I know now, and had I been
offered the choice to go or not, would I have gone to Vietnam? The short
answer to your question is no I would not have gone. The short reason is
because North Vietnam and the VC were fighting a civil war to unify their
country, much like we did during the American Civil War, 1861-1865. By
contrast, America fought the Vietnam War to stop the spread of communism,
an ideology that was seen as threatening to the American way of life
during most of the last half of the twentieth century. Our
"enemy" were fighting for their country against foreign invaders
(Americans); I can understand that, just like we are currently fighting
those who would seek to directly destroy America. We were fighting in
Vietnam to support a political theory. There is no question that when one
fights for his homeland, he does so with great perseverance and resolve.
When one fights solely for a theory, he does so with much less conviction.
We must pick our fights very carefully, and that lesson was surely learned
by America during the Vietnam War. The lesson was dearly paid for by the
58,193 names that are listed on "The Wall" in Washington, D.C.,
as well as by the families of those who are listed. That lesson continues
to exact a cost, a price, and in particular for me.
I am now 54 years old. About two years ago I was diagnosed with prostate
cancer, a disease that the Department of Veterans Affairs considers to be
"service-connected" because of the Agent Orange that was sprayed
in Vietnam during the war. Agent Orange was a herbicide used to defoliate
vegetation in order to deny the enemy cover; its active ingredient was
Dioxin, a highly toxic chemical. I am being treated for my cancer by the
Veteran's health system. So, there is a cost to be borne by those involved
long after the guns of war have ceased to sound. There is also a very real
cost to American taxpayers, again, long after a war has ended. Because the
personal and societal consequences of war can last 50, 60 years or longer,
it is imperative that you and those of generation become well informed so
that you can make sound judgments about your future and the future of this
country.
I am glad that you enjoyed my "Whizzer" story. I intended it as
a light-hearted look at a moment for me in an otherwise dismal period of
time. However, there were other, darker moments as well.
By the way, I intend to forward this email to my youngest niece. She is a
freshman in high school, and perhaps she can learn something by reading my
response to you. Lastly, I understand that the repeated recitation of
facts about death tolls, places, dates, and the like can lead to a
de-sensitized view of war by students who must sit quietly and listen to
the same old stuff. In that regard, I appreciate the opportunity you have
provided me to put my personal spin on things, to put some living flesh
and bone to history, and to encourage you to seek understanding of the
world around you.
Sincerely yours...Dan McKegney
Lisa's Reply to Me
Thank you very much. I completely
understand your reasoning. The United States' policy regarding communism
and the fear of the 'domino effect' really struck a sour note when I ran
across it in past reading, so I see exactly where you're coming from.
I shared your response with my
English teacher, and she read it aloud today during class. Being as
close to the end of the year as it is, and considering that my class is
comprised entirely of seniors, we're a typically (and increasingly)
rowdy bunch. But while she read what you wrote, they were silent, and
actually listened. I was shocked, and almost proud. Not only were they
listening, but they even remained quiet when she was finished. This is a
massive achievement, hard to relate in an email, but I thought you might
like to know.
I'm sorry to hear about the
cancer. But if it's any consolation at all, I think that may have had
the most impact on my classmates and myself. It's a very real thing that
most never connect with Vietnam. I'm fairly familiar with similar
complications experienced by Gulf War vets, and I'd like to
believe that at least a few of my classmates are as well. Your
representation of Agent Orange as an extraneous danger to both sides
really established a connection between things like the Gulf War, and to
the chemical weapons used in World War I. I know that there were some in
the class that hadn't made that connection that did today, myself
included. Being so removed from the era, and given such limited
information as we are (in the school's defense, it is hard to cram the
entire history of the United States into one year) things like this
really make an impression, and have very honestly made me think a lot
about it over the last few days. Such to the point where I'm planning to
go find a good book about Vietnam tomorrow. I know for certain that a
few of my classmates, who feel education in general anathema to them,
have a new interest in it as well. You elicited an actual
"wow" from some of the most apathetic teenagers I've ever met
:o)
A millions thanks for your time,
Lisa
|
|