The greatest obscenity perpetrated on humanity is war!
MEMO
To: Ms Faulk; English Department
Mr. Mike Arnold; Special Needs Coordinator
Enterprise High School
Enterprise, Alabama 36330
From: Richard Cunnare
Enterprise, Alabama 36330
TAG@Entercom.com
Subject: Essay written
for senior English, by David Cunnare, on the subject of hero's.
You are a wonderful teacher and you have inspired my son to write
and express emotion well beyond his years. Your work load is staggering
and I have only the utmost respect for the sacrifices you make to prepare
our high school youth for life. Enterprise High School is truly one of
the finest in this nation. In no small part as a result of the blood,
sweet, toil and tears shed by you and Mike Arnold. Please let me assure
you that this communication in no way reflects the attitude or current
feelings of David Cunnare. However please be advised, I did write this
over David's protest. Nonetheless my purpose for this memo is to express
how deeply offended I am in regard to the essay David turned in and you
and Mr. Arnold found to be obscene.
When David told me, he was going to write
an essay about Dexter Florence I asked him if he felt the subject may
be one that may be better left alone. Those of us who actually did the
fighting in Vietnam are members of a brotherhood. There is nothing that
can be done to ease the pain still felt by so many of us as a result of
our doing our duty during one of the most difficult periods this nation
has ever been through.
I discussed this with David prior to his
writing the final copy that the greatest honor that can be paid to men
who served their nation with great valor is to tell the truth and get
the facts straight. Subsequently, I reviewed the supposedly approved title,
outline and draft. I helped him by correcting the technical facts about
type of aircraft and people involved and told him why we required to fly
in such a ominous environment. We then had one of the most remarkable
conversations a father and son could ever exchange and it left me feeling
self-assured that David will be a good compassionate man.
The esteem David showed by taking on this
essay was dramatically demonstrated in the body of the essay which you
apparently were untouched by. It was published on the Internet by a Veteran
who was deeply touched by it. At this point in time the only reaction
you have given this young man is that he should write another essay on
a different subject and not be allowed to change the title and modify
the first paragraph. Ms Faulk, the expression "Big Cojones" is trooper
slang and is reserved as the highest level of praise one member of the
fraternity has for someone who's gallantry has performed a service that
no reasonable expressions can describe.
For those of us who have fought for the
lives of our comrades the term "Big Cojones" has a meaning the safeguarded
will never know. You see soldiers do not fight and die for their country,
Yes, soldiers do conduct operations to destroy the enemies of their country.
In spite of that the reason they fight is to keep their buddies alive.
They are empowered by a substantial primeval fear of spending the rest
of their lives with the guilt and shame of a being a veteran who got home
at the expense of their comrades.
I discussed this with David prior to his
writing the final draft. I discussed the risk that using idiom or slang
in formal writing and how it can be taken out of context by the untrained
who do not have from personal experience the prerequisite for understanding.
However, you had not expressed any emotions when you reviewed his work
prior the final draft. I found it irregular based on your reputation for
excellence. As a result of your lack of not taking time to make the teaching
point about using the most respectable statement in the title of an essay.
I questioned David to make sure that you had actually held his work in
your hands. His reply was that you had[n't] made any comment what so ever
and by doing so he felt you gave your approval because you are a very
strict good person and teacher.
I asked David why he wanted to use such
a symbolic title on the subject of heroes. David's reply was because he
felt that strongly about (or in words like these) "the man who gave you
your life back." I told David that based on Ms Faulk's, apparent approval.
I certainty would allow him in light of his strong feelings to go ahead
but be prepared to change the title and opening paragraph if at some point
in time anyone takes offense. Apparently you and Mr. Arnold have decided
not to give David the option of changing the title and the opening paragraph
treating this as a shameful disciplinary issue.
When you questioned David later on about
what the title meant and he replied giving a biological definition instead
of a metaphoric one, you decided to take it to Mr. Arnold as a disciplinary
matter and I am shocked that through your collaborative efforts assuming
that you did so under the school rule against obscenity. Certainty this
is with in your liberty to take offense. It is certainly my prerogative
to take offense and to relay just how you have humiliated this boy's efforts
to honor the Cunnare, Dean and Florence families by casting out this work.
I am especially incredulous at Mike Arnold as he pins his Vietnam service
medal on his collar every day. I have never seen Mike without it. I can
not say anything as to his motivation for doing so because everyone has
reason for displaying such a badge of honor and it is very private, extraordinary
only to that veterans personal experience.
There was a time that a person could be
harassed or even spit on for such a visual display. There are even documented
cases of soldiers who wore their uniforms home from Vietnam shot dead
before they even returned to their loved ones only because they served
and did their duty. Knowing Mike Arnold and knowing the combat record
of the 173 Airborne in Vietnam I can forgive and have forgiven all the
rotten things I once conjured up about him and he is an inspiration for
all men that are as messed up as he is and perform such valuable service
to their communities. Mike is a good man but he is just a little too shell
shocked to be clear on this issue. Mike was an artillerymen who was trained
to believe that when firing his cannon he should look at the danger of
his shells hitting a helicopter as big sky little bullet. Or to believe
that the mission of the field artillery is to provide dignity to the battle
field. I also believe that there is no man alive today who ever spit on
Mike Arnold for his Vietnam service.
David completed an essay that produced
such strong emphatic emotion from all of it's intended readers, except
you and Mike. He communicated consideration for the men who made his life
possible. This essay is being placed in the memorial wall case at Henderson
State University dedicated to Dexter Florence, by Bill Florence. When
Dexter's brother Bill Florence read this essay he cried like I did. When
I explained how you treated this issue Bill was filled with the same rage.
I never had the opportunity to observe Dexter Florence male parts because
no cobra pilot in his right mind would shower with a scout pilot. So speaking
from only the intended symbolic meaning of David's essay about the heroic
service Dexter Florence provided me. I can assure you that David's choice
of words most accurately expresses the feelings of those who had in their
lives the honor of fighting the North Vietnamese Army with Dexter Florence.
I would suggest a book that does honor
the spirit and communicates the feelings now being shared openly about
the heroism of aircrews in Vietnam. It was written by the noted Vietnam
War historians Charles Holly and Mike Sloniker, The Primer of the Helicopter
War. I may add that Mike Solinker has a god given gift for using words
that describe the heroism of men at war. Words that standing alone out
of context are obscenity by any standard. You must understand the problem
associated with writing about combat. If read by someone who has never
lived through such an experience it is impossible to communicate the experience.
War is a personal experience and no two people are ever going to experience
it the same. My personal experiences and it's effect on my sons are personnel
nor should anyone try to second guess that experience.
The greatest obscenity perpetrated on humanity
is war! When war breaks out men who have limited training to enable them
to endure the suffering placed on the mind, body and sprit are duty bound
to sacrifice their very lives. These men and women endure and perform
under conditions that break the spirit of most. These people are this nations
warriors and they do things that the protected class never experiences.
As a result they are changed forever. But what never changes is the need
for warriors. The gratitude and tolerance of their countrymen for their
valor and sacrifice should be a given by social norm.
Sadly, the generation of the Vietnam Veteran
has had their valor stolen from them by people who have blamed that war
for all their ills. Stolen by impostors who claim service for their personal
gain yet they have never felt emotions from fear that is so strong that
they forever change the people who have experienced them. It changes not
only warriors but it effects families of the men and women whom by the
passed on trauma of their experiences feel pain. This passed on trauma
can dramatically change the lives of those around them. The families whose
loyalty, love and support sustain these veterans can be tested.
I hope that you understand that I have
been deeply moved by your lack of empathy to this effort by my son. Ms
Faulk with your tacit approval and later your taking offense, I can only
hope are a lack empathy and not your own latent beliefs as to the value
of the Vietnam War and personal feelings for those who fought it. I hope
in the future you will be more attuned to the feelings of those who served
honorably, asked for nothing, gave all and had sons or daughters as a
gift from a fallen comrade. Ms Faulk, it is my personal belief obscenity
can be found anywhere if you are looking for it.
The need to think of this issue in context
to the shed blood of Dexter Florence and my son's personal relationship
to his memory. That is the perspective from which I expected this issue
to be evaluated. It is time for this nation's teachers to look at the
lessons from this war and all the suffering it caused. When all of us
use the past shed blood of these men and apply it to our current status
as a nation good can be seen.
The toughening brought to this nation and
its current prosperity are a direct result of those Vietnam era veterans
as they assumed leadership of our forces and government and was fueled
by a burning memory of those committed fallen. Not one of those men died
in vain and it is about time we start to show the proper respect. If I
can be of any further assistance in providing sensitivity training on
the subject of the Vietnam War and it's relationship to my family and
this nation please feel free to call on me. Ms Faulk and Mr. Arnold, once
again let me commend you for your service to your nation, community and
school.
Respectfully,
Richard Cunnare
Veteran of the Vietnam War